Mother of missing Fla. toddler arrested again
More white parenting 101…
ORLANDO, Fla. – The $500,000 bond posted a week ago for the mother of a missing Florida girl was rescinded after she was taken back to jail on check fraud and theft charges, a bondsman said Saturday.
Orange County Sheriff’s Office investigators took Casey Anthony into custody at her home Friday night, just a week after she was released on bond for charges related to 3-year-old Caylee’s disappearance.
Anthony was being held on $3,000 bond on the new charges of uttering a forged instrument, fraudulent use of personal information and petty theft, Capt. Angelo Nieves said.
According to sheriff’s office reports, Anthony used a friend’s checkbook to buy items at Target and Winn-Dixie, and to write a check for cash in July.
The 22-year-old has already been charged with child neglect, making false statements and obstructing the investigation into her daughter’s disappearance.
“The allegations surfaced during the investigation but we had to do our due diligence,” Nieves said of the new charges.
On Saturday, a bondsman said the $500,000 bond posted for the charges related to Caylee’s disappearance was rescinded in the middle of the night, making it unlikely she will be released again.
California bail bondsman Tony Padilla said the bond was surrendered based on the latest charges, new evidence and “heightened security concerns” that he declined to describe.
Anthony was to appear in court on the new charges Saturday morning, but that hearing was delayed.
Police say Anthony is a person of interest in the disappearance of her daughter, who hasn’t been seen since mid-June. Anthony did not report her daughter missing until July.
At a press conference outside the Anthony family home, Casey Anthony’s attorney called her latest arrest “grandstanding” on the part of law enforcement.
“They are not searching for anyone,” attorney Jose Baez said. “They are disingenuous.”
Several people from a California bail bonds company helped Anthony post bond, saying she might be more likely to talk about her daughter’s disappearance if she were released from jail. But Padilla said Friday he no longer believes the girl is alive.
“Absolutely not,” he said.
Anthony family spokesman Larry Garrison called the arrest a “three-ring circus.”
“Casey’s attorney, Jose Baez, diligently tried to contact authorities to surrender his client,” he said. “The arrest and the drama at the Anthony home tonight only added insult upon injury for the family of the kidnapped child.”
The State Attorney’s Office and Anthony’s attorney had discussed granting her limited immunity, according to e-mails from prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick. Under the offer, Anthony would provide statements to investigators, but prosecutors couldn’t use them against her in court. However, they could use any evidence they find as a result.
Burdick said the offer is set to expire Tuesday.
White mayor’s plea for “ugly women” backfires
Why are whites so shallow?
John Molony, the mayor of Mount Isa, found himself under attack after the suggestion that telling a local newspaper “with five blokes to every girl, may I suggest that beauty-disadvantaged women should proceed to Mount Isa” reports Reuters.
According to the Associated Press, Molony’s comments, published in the Townsville Bulletin, sparked outrage among the town’s female population, led to furious online debates and drew criticism from the local chamber of commerce.
Mayor Molony has refused to apologise for his comments and added that, in a testosterone-laden town famous for cowboys and mining, he was simply “telling it like it is”.
However, the situation may not be quite as dire as Molony noted. The Associated Press reports that, according to the 2006 census, men make up 52.6 percent of Mount Isa’s population of nearly 20,000.
Defense Intelligence Agency Seeking “Mind Control” Weapons
Why are whites so hell bent on global domination? A “civilization” of control freaks who will tolerate no dissent?
A new report from the National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council (NRC) argues that the Pentagon should harvest the fruits of neuroscientific research in order to enhance the “warfighting” capabilities of U.S. soldiers while diminishing those of enemy personnel.
The 151-page report issued by a 16-member blue ribbon commission, “Cognitive Neuroscience Research and National Security,” was quietly announced in an August 13 National Academy of Sciences Press Release.
Commissioned by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Pentagon spy shop, the study asserts that the U.S. intelligence “community” must do a better job following cutting-edge research in neuroscience or as is more likely, steering it along paths useful to the Defense Department. According to the NRC,
A 2005 National Research Council report described a methodology for gauging the implications of new technologies and assessing whether they pose a threat to national security. In this new report, the committee applied the methodology to the neuroscience field and identified several research areas that could be of interest to the intelligence community: neurophysiological advances in detecting and measuring indicators of psychological states and intentions of individuals, the development of drugs or technologies that can alter human physical or cognitive abilities, advances in real-time brain imaging, and breakthroughs in high-performance computing and neuronal modeling that could allow researchers to develop systems which mimic functions of the human brain, particularly the ability to organize disparate forms of data. (“National Security Intelligence Organizations should Monitor Advances in Cognitive Neuroscience Research,” National Academy of Sciences, Press Release, August 13, 2008)
Unlocking the secrets of the brain is projected as the next growth industry for the military, academia and corporate grifters hoping to land huge Pentagon contracts. As defense analyst Noah Shachtman reported in Wired, the “Army has given a team of University of California researchers a $4 million grant to study the foundations of “synthetic telepathy.” Unlike “remote viewing” research funded by the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency between 1972 and 1996, variously known as “Grill Flame,” “Sun Streak” and finally, “Star Gate” before the plug was pulled, the Army-U.C. Irvine joint venture are exploring thought transmission via a brain-computer mediated interface.
Recently New Scientist reported on a series of bizarre experiments at the University of Reading in the UK. Researchers there have connected 300,000 disembodied rat neurons suspended in “a pink broth of nutrients and antibiotics” to 80 electrodes at the base of the growth medium. As journalist Paul Marks informs us, the “rat neurons have made–and continue to make–connections with each other.” The voltages sparked by the firing cells are displayed on a computer screen.
Welcome to the “brave new world” of neural prosthetics and the militarists who are exploiting science and technology for new weapons applications.
Declaring that emerging technologies such as brain imaging and cognitive and physical enhancers are “desired by the public,” NRC avers “such forces act as strong market incentives for development.” But as Rick Weiss cautions on the Science Progress blog,
But even more interesting to me is the report’s discussion of the emerging market in brain-targeted, performance-degrading techniques. Some experiments, it turns out, suggest that magnetic beams can be used to induce seizures in people, a tempting addition to the military’s armamentarium. More conventionally, as scientists discover new chemicals that can blur thinking or undermine an enemy’s willpower, and as engineers design aerosolized delivery systems that can deliver these chemicals directly to the lungs (and from there, the brains) of large groups of people, the prospect of influencing the behavior of entire enemy regiments becomes real. (“Minding Mental Minefields,” Science Progress, August 15, 2008)
The use of so-called calmative agents as non-lethal weapons are already under development. As Antifascist Calling reported last month in “The Calmative Before the Storm,” the Pentagon’s Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) are carrying out experiments into what it euphemistically calls “Human Effects Research” and developing an “Advanced Total Body Model for predicting the effects of non-lethal impacts.”
Apparently the DIA has taken this a step further and will now explore the possibility of creating aerosolized pharmacological agents that can disrupt and perhaps influence, the mental functioning of targeted populations abroad, enemy soldiers or dissenting citizens here in the United States.
Neil Davison, a researcher with the Bradford Disarmament Research Centre (BDRC) at Bradford University in the UK, wrote an important 2007 study, “‘Off the Rocker’ and ‘On the Floor’: The Continued Development of Biochemical Incapacitating Weapons.” Davison examined the historical differentiation made by weaponeers between “off the rocker” agents such as LSD, PCP and psilocybin in their allegedly weaponized forms versus “on the floor” agents such as sedatives, opiate analgesics and anesthetic chemicals.
During the “golden age” of the CIA and U.S. Army’s quixotic search for “mind control” agents during the 1950s and 1960s, researchers were seeking a reliable mechanism that would unlock the secrets of the mind–and gain control over witting or unwitting subjects–for intelligence and counterintelligence purposes. Hundreds, if not thousands, of unethical experiments were carried out on psychiatric patients, civilians and soldiers. The results were subsequently suppressed on grounds on “national security.”
While the majority of CIA MKULTRA files were ordered destroyed by former Agency Director Richard Helms in 1973, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held landmark 1977 hearings and issued a report, “Project MKULTRA, The CIA’s Program of Research in Behavioral Modification.” As Senator Ted Kennedy discussed in his opening remarks,
Some 2 years ago, the Senate Health Subcommittee heard chilling testimony about the human experimentation activities of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over 30 universities and institutions were involved in an “extensive testing and experimentation” program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens “at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign.” Several of these tests involved the administration of LSD to “unwitting subjects in social situations.” …
We believed that the record, incomplete as it was, was as complete as it was going to be. Then one individual, through a Freedom of Information request, accomplished what two U.S. Senate committees could not. He spurred the agency into finding additional records pertaining to the CIA’s program of experimentation with human subjects. … The records reveal a far more extensive series of experiments than had previously been thought. Eighty-six universities or institutions were involved. New instances of unethical behavior were revealed.
The Central Intelligence Agency drugged American citizens without their knowledge or consent. It used university facilities and personnel without their knowledge. It funded leading researchers, often without their knowledge. (emphasis added)
While the CIA’s MKULTRA project and related Army ventures carried out at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, may have failed to develop specific agents that could be wielded as a “mind control” weapon, the research did result in the development of abusive interrogation techniques that can only be characterized as torture.
As Antifascist Calling queried in “Neuroscience, National Security & the ‘War on Terror’,” “If behavioral psychology was handmaid to the horrors perpetrated at Guantánamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and CIA transnational ‘black sites,’ what new nightmares are in store for humanity when advances in neuroscience, complex computer algorithms and a secretive national security state enter stage (far) right?”
Apparently horrors of the “mind control” variety, particularly when it comes to applications for ever-newer and more insidious interrogation/control techniques to be used on “enemy combatants” or dissenting malefactors in the heimat.
According to the NRC and the corporate-academic grifters involved in the research, cognitive warfare should be sold as a “more humane” method of advancing imperialist objectives. As the report baldly states, the equation “pills instead of bullets” will be the preferred marketing technique employed for “selling” the program to the American people. As anthropologist Hugh Gusterson wrote,
The military and scientific leaders chartering neuroweapons research will argue that the United States is a uniquely noble country that can be trusted with such technologies, while other countries (except for a few allies) cannot. They will also argue that these technologies will save lives and that U.S. ingenuity will enable the United States to dominate other countries in a neuroweapons race. When it is too late to turn back the clock, they will profess amazement that other countries caught up so quickly and that an initiative intended to ensure American dominance instead led to a world where everyone is threatened by chemicalized soldiers and roboterrorists straight out of Blade Runner. (The militarization of neuroscience,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9 April 2007)
But as the world looked on in horror at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay, this “uniquely noble country” guided by “ethical principles,” resorted to repugnant methods such as sensory deprivation, near drowning and “self-inflicted pain” techniques (short-shackling and the like) to achieve control over defenseless prisoners.
As the NRC would have it, academics in thrall to corporate funding and state agencies staffed by war criminals now expect us to believe that “ethics” will guide those exploring pharmacological methods to obtain more insidious means to subjugate humanity.
Weiss reports that the NRC notes in its report, the motivation, or lack thereof, to fight, is of great concern to Pentagon bureaucrats and policy makers. “So one question,” for military-corporate-academic funded research “would be, ‘How can we disrupt the enemy’s motivation to fight?’ Other questions raised by controlling the mind: ‘How can we make people trust us more?’ ‘What if we could help the brain to remove fear or pain?’ ‘Is there a way to make the enemy obey our commands?’…As cognitive neuroscience and related technologies become more pervasive, using technology for nefarious purposes becomes easier.”
But as is usual with all such screeds, the psychoanalytic theory of projection comes in handy when deciphering the monstrous intent of Pentagon weaponeers. It is all-too-clear whether we are discussing nuclear, biological, chemical or contemporaneously, cognitive weapons that Western proponents of preemptive war, always couch their acts of violent imperialist aggression in purely defensive terms.
In this light, Freud and his followers have defined projection as a form of defense in which unwanted feelings are displaced onto another person, and where aggressive impulses then appear as a threat from the external world. In the case of corporate defense and security grifters, their militarist pit bulls and the academic sycophants who fuel their deranged “cognitive warfare” fantasies, the other–a nation, a dispossessed class or a bogeyman such as “international terrorism”–are always the external harbingers of apocalyptic death and destruction, when in reality such fantasies are wholly reflective of their own desire to aggressively dominate and plunder other nations.
Therefore, the NRC maintains, and note the ideologically-skewed reference to the eternal verities of “the market,” the Holy Grail of capitalism in its hyperimperialist phase:
The fear that this approach to fighting war might be developed will be justification for developing countermeasures to possible cognitive weapons. This escalation might lead to innovations that could cause this market area to expand rapidly. Tests would need to be developed to determine if a soldier had been harmed by a cognitive weapon. And there would be a need for a prophylactic of some sort. (NRC, op. cit.)
Who, pray tell, is driving this “escalation” and counting on academia to produce “innovations” in “this market area”? One might also quite reasonably inquire: Who profits?
As Christopher Green, the chairman of the NRC investigative panel championing neuroweapons research avers in a roundtable discussion sponsored by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Big Pharma is global. Drug discovery research is both ponderous (not as much as arms control, however) and increasingly beyond the control of governments and the public. The development of cognitive enhancers and anti-aging aides during the next two decades (the time needed for drug discovery to become successful) will be…ethically worrisome. But it will be beyond opprobrium. Drugs will be developed and marketed, and not necessarily under the auspices of traditional Western controls and good laboratory practices. (“The potential impact of neuroscience research is greater than previously thought,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9 July 2008) [emphasis added]
While Green claims he is opposed to developing drugs “with safe and efficacious properties for military use,” the NRC study, after all, was funded by the Defense Intelligence Agency, hardly a “neutral party” when it comes to “enhanced interrogation techniques” and other horrors of this horrible system!
One must also dissect the linguistic formulations and assumptions deployed by those advocating this line of research. By referring to neuroweapons production as a “market area,” those contemplating unleashing devilish pharmacological forms of warfare on unsuspecting populations behave, in you’ll pardon the pun, as if they were brainstorming the release of a new video game or suite of luxury condominiums in an American city “ethnically cleansed” of its urban poor!
Green and his acolytes claim that “battlefield commanders of all nations hold sacrosanct the right to determine the applications” of weapon deployments that may cause “collateral damage” to civilian noncombatants. Therefore, Green argues that “if governments or scientists were to try to develop a system to pre-screen neuroscientific cognitive manipulators, which would be HIPAA approved and tested, and robust in its core science, success would be as likely as it was with mines and cluster-bombs–meaning not likely.” Translation: full-speed ahead!
While the NRC allege that their approach to monitoring neuroweapons research is “ethical,” the committee ponders whether “the concept of torture could also be altered by products in this market. It is possible that someday there could be a technique developed to extract information from a prisoner that does not have any lasting side effects.”
Other than the hollowing-out of one’s personality and the unique traits that make us human, that is. “Paging Winston Smith, white courtesy telephone!”
While Nazi theories of Aryan superiority may have been displaced by a uniquely American ultranationalist, though no less predatory utilitarian praxis, behind the glittering technological promises trumpeted by today’s biotech weaponeers lurk the same murderous mental constructs that guided Indian hunters and slave traders of yore.
Only this time, we’re all Manchurian candidates.
Colorado city official cancels Al-Jazeera barbecue
Why are whites afraid of free speech?
GOLDEN, Colo. – The city manager of Golden, Colo., has decided to withdraw his invitation to let the Al-Jazeera news network broadcast from a barbecue in his backyard on the final night of the Democratic National Convention.
City manager Mike Bestor has apologized for any divisiveness he caused in the city of about 18,000, about 15 miles west of Denver.
Bestor made his decision after a City Council meeting Thursday at which residents complained the event with the English-language service of the Middle East news network would be disrespectful to veterans and active U.S. soldiers.
Al-Jazeera is based in Qatar and is funded by the royal family of the Persian Gulf nation. The network says its English service reaches at least 100 million households worldwide.
Disgraced white pastor a porn addict
Shades of Jimmy Swaggart. How do whites reconcile pornography and religion?

THE father of disgraced pastor Michael Guglielmucci has revealed his son has been addicted to pornography since the age of 12.
Danny Guglielmucci – whose high-profile preacher son last week week admitted his two-year battle with cancer was fake – said the “severe addiction to pornography” was part of a bizarre double life his son had been leading.
Mr Guglielmucci, who established Edge Church International, an Assemblies of God church in Adelaide, said Melbourne-based Michael had made a full confession to his family about his past, including revelations about the 16-year porn obsession and the lies over his supposed battle with terminal illness.
In an exclusive interview with Adelaide’s Sunday Mail this week, Mr Guglielmucci also revealed:
HIS son has been suffering “mystery illnesses” since the age of 12.
DOCTORS gave his parents the option of admitting him to a psychiatric ward for assessment as a child over the ongoing “illnesses”, but they refused.
THE family’s “absolute shock” at discovering Michael was not terminally ill.
Mr Guglielmucci said he and wife Sharonne – who founded Edge Church International with him – were struggling to comprehend what their son had done.
They are expected to address the church’s Adelaide congregation today to explain his actions.
“When (Michael) rang me last Tuesday, I was on my way to New Zealand,” Mr Guglielmucci said.
“He said, ‘Dad you’ve got to come and see me’.
“I said to my wife, ‘Maybe the doctors have told him he’s only got a few weeks to live’.
“So we cancelled everything and jumped on the plane and went to see him in Melbourne, and that’s when he told us the story.
“We were just in absolute shock and we still are. We haven’t had time to get our head around it. He said, ‘I don’t have cancer. I’ve had two lives that I’ve lived’.
“His wife (Amanda), who has been with him for seven years, found out the day before we did and she’s had no idea.
“Michael has had a severe addiction to pornography. The addiction to pornography started when he was 12.
“It’s horrendous because we don’t have that sort of stuff around. He was raised in a Christian home; we’ve never brought that stuff into our home.”
Michael Guglielmucci was one of Australia’s highest-profile Christian preachers, inspiring hundreds of thousands around the world as he performed his hit song Healer with an oxygen tube in his nose.
He was a pastor with Planetshakers, a Christian youth movement that began in Adelaide and has grown into an international ministry.
But that all came crashing down this week when his deception became public.
Mr Guglielmucci said his son finally confessed after the guilt of his lies and addiction became overwhelming.
“He lived the two lives and he would get sick as a result of the guilt,” he said.
“He was feeling like he was letting God down, letting his family down, his church, his friends.
“He’s been living this for so long, feeling like he’s had these two lives and now he’s the one that’s come out in the open. He confessed it, he didn’t get caught.
“To deal with the guilt he would pour himself into doing good work. He’s touched the lives of young people all over the world. Now they are all affected by this.
“He hasn’t done this for any reasons that have been portrayed that he’s a fraud.
“It was either keep pretending or come out with the truth and tell everything. He’s come out with everything but now we’ve got the consequences of it all.
“We have to accept it. We’re hoping to share with our congregation how it all started and how it got where it is.
“We understand people’s anger, we understand their questioning.
“There’s so many questions.
“An addiction like this is not going to be fixed overnight. You can’t have a 16-year problem and fix it in a week.”
Mr Guglielmucci said his son was undergoing psychiatric assessment with Adelaide doctors.
“They have said to me that he is very ill. They are assessing where reality stopped and fantasy kicked in and what’s caused all this,” he said.
“The doctor believes that at times Michael was totally convinced that he had this sickness.”
Mr Guglielmucci said his son had a long history of “mystery illnesses”, starting in childhood.
“When he was about 12 he did vomit all the time, he’d get really really sick,” he said.
“He was in the Adelaide Children’s Hospital for seven weeks at one stage; he didn’t eat and we thought we were going to lose him.
“They took out his appendix, thinking that it might be that, but they realised that it wasn’t.
“They gave us the option of putting him in a psychiatric ward to see if there was something psychological but we felt uncomfortable with that at the time.
“We signed him out from hospital and then he would go a few months and then he would get sick again.
“We’d always take him to hospital; we’d always do the proper thing but they couldn’t get to the bottom of it until now.”
Mr Guglielmucci said he and his wife were in “absolute shock” to discover their son was not terminally ill.
“We have watched our son go through what we thought was cancer,” he said.
“My wife and I, over the past two years, have watched him vomit in buckets, having nosebleeds, and even his hair fell out in clumps at one stage.
“Every time we saw him, we saw symptoms. He stayed with us for a while where we had to put a special air-conditioner in one of the rooms because he would heat up so much in the middle of winter.
“He had this cold air-conditioner blowing on him to try to keep the heat down. As a professional minister I’ve stood in front of my congregation and cried and said to pray for my son.
“I’ve travelled the world asking people to pray for him. Can you imagine what a horrible thing it would be if I was playing a game?
“To be honest, I ask myself as a father, ‘What did I miss, what did I not do? What could I have done better?’ “
Mr Guglielmucci said Michael’s wife was “getting really good counselling”.
“She’s not made any decision at this point,” he said.
“It’s happened so quickly. There’s so many questions.”
White terrorists kill 76 Afghan civilians
Winning hearts and minds, as usual.
Kabul, Aug. 23: Afghan villagers protested against troops on Saturday amid claims that 76 civilians, most of them children, were killed in airstrikes on the Taliban as the US military opened a probe into the incident.
President Hamid Karzai condemned civilian casualties from Friday’s clashes in the western province of Herat but there were conflicting claims about the death toll, with the US-led coalition saying only 30 rebels were killed.
It was difficult to independently verify what had happened near the village of Azizabad, about 120 km south of Herat city, with the area considered dangerous and a stronghold of the Taliban and other militants.
Villagers gathered in an angry demonstration on Saturday, hurling stones at Afghan troops, the police chief for western Afghanistan, General Akram Yawar said.
Shots were fired into the air to disperse the crowd and two people were wounded, he said.
The troops were forced back into their compound, he said by telephone with the crowd’s chants against the government and the international troops heard in the background.
The US military, which has been accused of killing scores of other civilians in action against insurgents, including around 50 at a wedding party in July, said it would investigate.
“Coalition forces make every effort to prevent the injury or loss of innocent lives. An investigation has been directed,” said a coalition statement from the main US military base at Bagram, north of Kabul.
Its investigations generally take a long time. The results of the investigation into the strikes on the wedding party in the eastern province of Nangarhar have still not been made public.
The force insisted on Friday that only 30 militants were killed in fighting and air strikes that followed an ambush on troops going to arrest a “known” Taliban commander.
The interior ministry said it had sent a delegation to the area while the United Nations urged against “jumping to conclusions” but was also trying to find out what happened.
If the death toll is confirmed it would be one of the highest for civilians in the battle against the extremist Taliban, who were ousted during a US-led invasion in 2001.
“Seventy-six people, all civilians and most of them women and children, were martyred,” the interior ministry said late on Friday. The dead were “19 women, seven men and the rest children all under 15 years of age,” it said.
The police said on Friday that 15 houses were destroyed in air strikes.
In a statement condemning the event, Mr Karzai accused of the troops of acting without coordinating with local authorities and “innocently martyring at least 70 people, most of them women and children.”
Mr Karzai has regularly met international troops to urge them to increase efforts to avoid killing civilians.
These efforts “have not yet brought a fruitful conclusion and our civilians are victims of anti-terrorist operations,” the statement said. The forces accuse insurgents of deliberately sheltering among ordinary people, sometimes using them as “human shields.” The United Nations advised “caution” on early reports of the tolls. Spokesman Aleem Siddique added: “The first rule of any counter-insurgency operating by any military force is do no harm.
“So it is a matter of concern that early reports seem to indicate that there has been a large number of civilian casualties.” A UN investigation into similar strikes in the same area in May 2007 found that 50 civilians were killed among several rebels. The coalition said only 136 Taliban fighters had died. Insurgency linked unrest has spiralled in Afghanistan, despite the presence of 70,000 international soldiers, with incidents said to be up by 50 per cent in parts of the country in 2008. —AFP
Stupid White Inventions : Bigfoot hoax
Why do white people see things no one else sees?


The supposed corpse of Bigfoot has been revealed as nothing but a rubber costume, and the two US men who boasted about its discovery are now – like the real Bigfoot – missing, an investigator says.
Matthew Whitton and Ricky Dyer, announced to the world last weekend that they had found a corpse of the legendary ape-like creature in a secret forest location in their home state of Georgia.
But the organisation that arranged that press conference, Searching for Bigfoot Inc, says it was all “a lie” and a “fraud”.
Investigator Steve Kulls wrote on the Searching for Bigfoot website that, after the supposed frozen corpse was examined on Sunday, it was found to be a fake.
“I extracted some [hair] from the alleged corpse and examined it and had some concerns,” he wrote.
“We burned said sample and said hair sample melted into a ball uncharacteristic of hair.
“At that time we contacted [Searching for Bigfoot CEO Tom Biscardi, who was present at the press conference] who gave us permission to begin an expedited melting process.
“Within one hour we were able to see the partially exposed head, as I was now able to touch it, I was able to feel that it seemed mostly firm, but unusually hollow in one small section. This was yet another ominous sign.
“As the team and I began examining this area near the feet, I observed the foot which looked unnatural, reached in and confirmed it was a rubber foot.
“Later that day, Tom Biscardi informed us that both Matthew Whitton and Ricky Dyer admitted it was a costume.”
Mr Whitton and Mr Dyer agreed to meet Mr Biscardi at a hotel later that day to provide a written admission of what they had done, Mr Kulls said.
But when Mr Biscardi arrived at the hotel, the pair had vanished, he said.
“The motives behind this fraud are still unknown at this time,” Mr Kulls said.
“It is still unclear why Whitton who, being a police officer for the Clayton County Police Department in Georgia, got up before the world and lied and was complicit in a scheme to defraud in a felonious manner.”
It was also revealed that Mr Biscardi paid an “undisclosed sum” to Mr Whitton and Mr Dyer as an advance on the returns expected from the “marketing and promotion” of the Bigfoot discovery announcement.
FoxNews.com reported the sum was rumoured to be $US50,000 ($57,000).
Loren Coleman, who runs Cryptomundo – a website devoted to cryptozoology, the study of hidden animals – said the whole scam appeared to be about money.
Despite the message on Mr Biscardi’s company’s website, which distanced him from the fraud, Mr Coleman said he was likely to have been part of the sham.
“He’s a huckster, a circus ringmaster,” he told FoxNews.com.
“It’s all about money with him. It probably didn’t matter to him whether it was real or not.
“[Mr Whitton and Mr Dyer] probably started out small, as a way to promote their Bigfoot tracking business, and got in way over their heads.
“These are not very intelligent individuals.”
King penguin receives Norwegian knighthood
Life must be boring in Norway.
LONDON – Nils Olav already has medals for good conduct and long service. He made honorary colonel-in-chief of the elite Norwegian King’s Guard in 2005. And on Friday he was knighted. Not bad for a 3-foot tall penguin — actually, three of them.
A resident of Edinburgh Zoo in Scotland, the original Nils Olav was made an honorary member of the King’s Guard in 1972 after being picked out as the guard’s mascot by lieutenant Nils Egelien. The guards adopted him because they often toured the zoo during their visits to the Edinburgh Military Tattoo, an annual military music festival, according to zoo spokeswoman Maxine Finlay.
The king penguin was named after Egelien and Norway’s then-King Olav V. When the penguin died — Finlay said no one at the zoo knew exactly when — he was replaced by a second penguin, who inherited Nils Olav’s name and rank.
The current Nils Olav, the third penguin to serve as the guards’ mascot, was promoted from honorable regimental sergeant major to honorary colonel-in-chief in 2005, Finlay said.
The knighthood ceremony began Friday morning with speeches and a fanfare before Nils arrived, under escort with the King’s Guard Color Detachment. Nils then reviewed the troops lined up outside the penguin enclosure at the zoo, waddling down the row of uniformed soldiers, occasionally stopping to crane his neck and peer inquisitively at their crisp uniforms before being guided forward by his handler.
Nils was then knighted by British Maj. Gen. Euan Loudon on behalf of Norway’s King Harald V. Loudon dropped the king’s sword on both sides of Nils’s black-and-white frame, and the penguin’s colonel-in-chief badge, tied to his flipper, was swapped for one symbolizing his knighthood.
“He’ll be a “sir” now,” Finlay said.
White war criminals imprison 9 year old
And they ask “why are we hated”?
Spanish basketball team poses for racist picture with “slit” eyes
Why do whites behave like this? Is this how they behave on the international stage with China being the host of the Olympics?
Spain’s Olympic basketball team posed for an advertisement prior to the Games which appears to show all its players slanting their eyes, a move that could offend its Olympic hosts in Beijing. The ads, for a Spanish courier company, appeared in the Spanish-language newspaper La Marca.
As the uproar over the picture has grown today, more information about the advertising shot has come to light. The ad was sponsored by a Spanish courier company, Seur. Spain’s team, ironically, also is sponsored by Li-Ning Footwear, a Chinese company founded by Li Ning, the final torchbearer who was hoisted along the top of Beijing National Stadium during the Olympic Opening Ceremony finale.
The Spanish-language paper El Mundo has a piece debating whether the ad was racist that basically calls out the British press for trying to smear Spain’s good name. But they miss the point. Whether the picture was made in good fun is irrelevant. It was a ridiculous idea that was bound to upset a lot of people.
It’s baffling that nobody involved in the picture — from the photographers to the players — even seemed to consider that this ad would be looked at negatively. Did it not occur to somebody that it might not be a good idea to mock a large portion of the continent before the world’s largest athletic competition that, by the way, happens to take place on that continent. Were they not aware of an invention called “the Internet” that allows pictures taken in Spain to be transmitted all over the world for the eyes of everyone?
And now that the inevitable controversy has hit, they’re still defending themselves when a simple, “the ad was in poor taste, we apologize” would have sufficed. This story would be slowing down if the Spanish Basketball team had apologized immediately. Now it’s just picking up steam.
The Organization of Chinese-Americans has released multiple statements condemning the picture. George Wu, deputy director of the group, said, “it is unfortunate that this type of imagery would rear its head during something that is supposed to be a time of world unity.” Response in Beijing has been muted so far.
Madrid is thought to be one of the frontrunners to land the 2016 Summer Games (the site will be announced next year). Could this controversy hurt Spain’s chances of landing another Olympics?
Interestingly, the Spanish basketball team took on China tonight, winning 85-75 in overtime. No word on whether Pau Gasol was on the receiving end of any elbows from Yao Ming. The Chinese crowd did have a message for the Spaniards though, booing vigorously during the game.
White child-snatch suspect is ‘wanted’
A pedophile with memory loss…how convenient!
A man accused of abducting his London-based daughter has been identified as a German wanted over the disappearance of a couple in 1985, US authorities say.
Clark Rockefeller, 48, was remanded in custody last week accused of taking Reigh Storrow Boss, seven, in Boston.
LA County sheriff’s department said he had now been “positively identified” as Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter, wanted for questioning in the California case.
Mr Rockefeller’s lawyer said his client had little memory of pre-1993 events.
Investigators say Mr Rockefeller’s fingerprints match those on an old licence application made by a man named Christopher Chichester, who lived in a guesthouse belonging to Jonathan and Linda Sohus at the time they went missing.
LA County Sheriff’s spokesman Steve Whitmore said detectives were “confident that Rockefeller is Christian Gerhartsreiter and the person named Christopher Chichester who was living in the Los Angeles area in 1985″.
Mr Gerhartsreiter had been been identified as a “person of interest” in the case in San Marino, California, he said.
Investigators had confirmed Mr Rockefeller was Mr Gerhartsreiter after interviewing people who knew him in California in the 1980s, Mr Whitmore added.
Skeletal remains
Under the name Chichester, he was known to have rented a guesthouse at the home of Mr and Mrs Sohus, who vanished while living in San Marino, about 10 miles north east of Los Angeles.
Skeletal remains, which police believe are those of Mr Sohus, were unearthed at the Sohus’s property in 1994 when new owners were installing a swimming pool.
But, when informed Mr Rockefeller had been identified as Mr Gerhartsreiter and Mr Chichester, Mr Rockefeller’s lawyer, Stephen Hrones, said his client did not remember his childhood in Germany or his time in California during the 1980s.
“They can do what they want with it, but he doesn’t remember anything. He remembers nothing before 1993, except for little bits and pieces,” he said.
Mr Rockefeller was arrested in Baltimore on 2 August over the alleged kidnapping of his daughter after a tip-off from a member of the public.
He was taken from Baltimore to Boston to face charges and was remanded in custody by Boston Municipal Court last Tuesday.
He is charged with felony custodial kidnapping, assault and battery, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon on 27 July.
The girl was reunited with her mother, Sandra Boss, who works for management consultancy McKinsey & Co in London, on 2 August.
Sweden relaxes rules on givings kids unusual names
Are these people capable of raising children?
STOCKHOLM, Sweden – Swedish authorities say parents can now name their newborns “Budweiser” or “Metallica” if they so wish.
For decades, Swedish tax authorities had banned parents from naming their children after fast food chains, rock bands or their favorite brand of beer.
But tax authority spokesman Lars Tegenfeldt says the guidelines have been relaxed. He says “there is nothing negative about a name like Coca-Cola or McDonald’s today. In the 1970s, maybe it was.”
Still, authorities are drawing the line at giving children swear words for names.
“Suicide” latest twist in 7-year anthrax saga
Suicide, or did he know something more then he should have?
WASHINGTON – The suspect suddenly emerged seven years after anthrax-laced letters terrorized a jittery country, then was gone just as quickly, committing suicide before authorities could charge him with murder.
The government’s working theory is that brilliant but troubled Army scientist Bruce E. Ivins released the anthrax to test his cure for the toxin. That may answer some questions, but many details remain unclear.
“I think the FBI owes us a complete accounting of their investigation and ought to be able to tell us at some point, how we’re going to bring this to closure,” said former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota, whose office received a letter containing the deadly white powder in 2001. “I think the American people deserve to know more than they do today.”
Ivins’ emergence as the top — and perhaps only — suspect came soon after the government exonerated another Army scientist in the case. Last month, the Justice Department cleared Ivins’ colleague, Steven Hatfill, who had been wrongly suspected in the case, and paid him $5.8 million.
Responding to reports about Ivins on Friday, the department said only that “substantial progress has been made in the investigation” and that it soon may be able to release more information about the case.
The department is expected to decide within days whether to close the “Amerithrax” investigation now that its main target is dead. If the case is closed, authorities are expected to speak with the families of the victims and update them about their case against Ivins.
Among the biggest unanswered questions is what led the FBI to Ivins after all these years. Ivins attracted some attention for conducting unauthorized anthrax testing in the six months following the anthrax mailings, but the FBI focus stayed on Hatfill.
The department attributed the progress to “new and sophisticated scientific tools.”
Investigators said the science focused, in part, on how the anthrax strains were handled and who had access to it at the time of the mailings. Had the same process been used years ago, it would have cleared Hatfill, according to two people familiar with the FBI investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is not officially closed.
Documents related to the investigation remain sealed.
For 35 years, Ivins was one of the government’s leading scientists researching vaccines and cures for anthrax exposure, work that earned him the Pentagon’s highest honor for civilian employees.
His research included one study that complained about the limits of testing anthrax drugs on animals. Eighteen months before the anthrax letters were sent, Ivins and other scientists applied for a patent for their anthrax vaccine.
The letters containing anthrax powder were sent soon after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The letters turned up at congressional offices, newsrooms and elsewhere, leaving a deadly trail through post offices on the way. The powder killed five and sent numerous victims to hospitals and caused near panic in many places.
Ivins’ friends, colleagues and court documents paint a picture of a flourishing scientist with an emotionally unstable side. Maryland court documents show he recently received psychiatric treatment and was ordered to stay away from a woman he was accused of stalking and threatening to kill.
Social worker Jean C. Duley filed handwritten court documents last week saying she was preparing to testify before a grand jury. She said Ivins would be charged with five capital murders.
“Client has a history dating to his graduate days of homicidal threats, plans and actions towards therapists,” Duley said, adding that his psychiatrist had described him as homicidal and sociopathic.
Several U.S. officials said prosecutors had been focusing on the 62-year-old Ivins and planned to seek an indictment and the death penalty. There was talk of a plea deal that would have instead sent Ivins to prison for life. Ivins’ lawyer was open to discuss the deal but his client killed himself before an agreement could be reached, one official said.
The officials all discussed the continuing investigation on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
Ivins’ lawyer, Paul F. Kemp, asserted the scientist’s innocence and said he had cooperated with investigators for more than a year.
“We are saddened by his death, and disappointed that we will not have the opportunity to defend his good name and reputation in a court of law,” Kemp said.
Maryland’s chief medical examiner, Dr. David Fowler, confirmed Saturday that Ivins died Tuesday morning at Frederick, Md., Memorial Hospital; that the cause of death was found to be an overdose of acetaminophen, the active drug in Tylenol; and that it was ruled a suicide based on information from police and doctors.
Kemp said his client’s death was the result of the government’s “relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo.”
Rescue crews had responded to Ivins’ home shortly after 1 a.m. last Sunday for a report of an unconscious man and took him by ambulance to the hospital, according to police and fire officials.
The Fort Detrick laboratory and its specialized scientists for years have been at the center of the FBI’s investigation of the anthrax mailings. In late June, the government exonerated Hatfill, whose name has for years had been associated with the attacks. Then-Attorney General John Ashcroft called him a “person of interest” in 2002.
Authorities recently reached out to Hatfill to let him know something was about to break in the case, but they didn’t ask for his cooperation because there was nothing for him to help with, one of the people close to the case confirmed.
Authorities had watched Ivins for some time. His brother, Tom Ivins, said federal agents questioned the scientist about a year and a half ago. Neighbors said FBI agents in cars with tinted windows conducted surveillance on his home. A colleague, Henry S. Heine, said that over the past year, he and others on their team had testified before a federal grand jury in Washington that has been investigating the anthrax mailings.
-
Archives
- November 2009 (12)
- October 2009 (36)
- September 2009 (14)
- August 2009 (46)
- July 2009 (38)
- June 2009 (32)
- May 2009 (38)
- April 2009 (29)
- March 2009 (32)
- February 2009 (25)
- January 2009 (23)
- December 2008 (16)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS








